medium_284804050
A brand new study in the European Journal of Applied Physiology looked at the neuromuscular adaptations during combined strength and endurance training in endurance runners (Taipale, Mikkola, Vesterinen, Nummela & Hakkinen, 2012).

This study is out of the University of Jyvaskyla in Finland.

This study compared the effects of 1) mixed maximal strength training & explosive strength training with 2) maximal (not mixed) strength training & 3) explosive strength training when combined with endurance training (running).
 

Subjects, study design and training

 
The intervention took place over 8-weeks. All subjects (n=37) were male recreational endurance runners (21-45 years in age) and were divided into 4-groups:

  • maximal strength training (MAX) (n=11)
  • explosive (EXP) (n=10)
  • mixed maximal & explosive (MIX) (n=9)
  • circuit training control group (CON) (n=7)

The subjects had no previous strength training experience aside from a 6-week period of preparatory training (consisting of 50 to 70% 1 repetition maximum – 1RM), which was completed prior to the strength training intervention.

The Intervention(s)

 
Strength training (and circuit training) was performed 1 to 2-times per week (supervised); whereas, endurance (running) training was performed 3 to 4-times per week. Endurance sessions (heart rate monitored) were performed on non-strength training days at an intensity below lactate threshold (pre-determined).

Endurance training volume was (in km and individualized based on training background and current fitness level):

  • 42.6 + 30.5 for MAX
  • 40.7 + 30.5 for EXP
  • 33.0 + 28.5 for MIX
  • 25.5 + 22.0 for CON

Total endurance training time per week was 5:38 + 0.56 hours; therefore, the researches were able to claim relative volume and intensity was similar.

Strength and explosive sessions were preceded with 20 to 30-minutes of low-intensity cardio and warm-up sets with sub maximal loads (squat and leg press exercise). 2 to 3-minutes break was given in between exercise sets for all the three strength and/or explosive training groups.

The circuit training group (control) performed a circuit of body weight squats, pushups, lunges, sit-ups, toe raises, back-ups, planks and step-ups in series – 45-sec work followed by 15-sec rest during the first 4 weeks and 50-sec work followed by 10-sec rest in the last 4-weeks. The researchers claim that this protocol was meant to improve muscular endurance, not strength.
 

Measurements

 
Measurements included body composition, aerobic capacity, isometric leg press strength, 1RM horizontal leg press, countermovement jump, EMG, and serum hormones.
 

Findings

 

Significant increases were seen in maximal dynamic strength (1RM), countermovement jump performance (power measure) and maximal muscle activation during the 1RM in the maximal strength training group.

Countermovement jump improved significantly in the explosive training group. Peak running speed and running speed at respiratory compensation threshold improved significantly in the maximal strength training group, explosive training group and mixed maximal & explosive training groups without a significant change in VO2-max or running economy.

Despite the fact that no improvements were made to VO2-max and running economy, the researchers indicate that improvements in peak running speed and running speed at respiratory compensation threshold still suggest improvements in endurance performance.

The significant changes in strength (1RM) and power (countermovement jump) were primarily observed during the first 4-weeks of the intervention and plateaued over the final 4-weeks – the researches attribute this plateau to the fact that the subjects participated in a 6-week pre-intervention strength training protocol (therefore, 10-weeks of strength training). The researches note that the improvements in strength over the 8-week period only averaged 3.5% – relatively low compared to inexperienced subjects participating in a strength-training-only intervention (10 to 20% increases are normally seen in this population).

No significant changes were seen in maximal isometric strength (isometric leg press) and muscle activation, rate of force development, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2) and running economy (at 10 and 12-km/hour).

“Improvements in strength and power appear to be highly individual, thus performing the more diverse mixture of maximal and explosive strength training in a way that meets individual needs may be more effective than maximal or explosive strength training combined with endurance training alone.”
Taipale et al.

In the circuit training control group, no significant changes were observed in maximal isometric strength, rate of force development, running economy, countermovement jump performance or muscle activation. Actually, a significant decrease in 1RM was seen in the final 4-weeks of training. This implies that the circuit training combined with the endurance training was not enough of a training stimulus to maintain or improve maximal strength. However, significant improvements were seen in peak running speed, running speed at respiratory compensation threshold and VO2-max. Due to the aerobic nature of circuit training, the researchers suggest that this may be a reason why this group saw an improvement in VO2-max (remember, they were only recreational runners; therefore, instead of doing only 4 aerobic workouts per week, they were actually doing 6 if you include the circuit training sessions).

The researchers state that low volume maximal strength training, explosive training or mixed maximal strength training & explosive training, when combined with a high(er) volume endurance (running) training program over an 8-week intervention period resulted in significant gains in strength, power and endurance performance measures (peak running speed & running speed at respiratory compensation threshold). The researchers add that these 3 protocols appear to be more effective than circuit training at increasing and maintaining maximal strength and explosive power. Muscle hypertrophy was not taken into account in this study; however, the researchers suggest that early adaptations (neural) caused by maximal strength and explosive-type training might explain the improvements seen in muscle activation during the dynamic 1RM (maximal strength training group) and countermovement jump (explosive training group).
 

The take home message(s)

 
Strength training can be attributed to either an increase in muscle cross sectional area and/or via neuromuscular acclimations (obviously, we know which result you runners want). Previous studies have linked strength training (in combination with endurance-type training) with improved performance economy (e.g. running and cross country skiing) in both males and females and in trained and un-trained populations.

Performance economy essentially means improvement in voluntary muscle activation (leading to increases in strength and power production), which is associated with an increase in speed and reduced oxygen consumption (cost).

Circuit training with body weight exercises (and no explosive exercises) does not appear to be helpful for improving overall strength and running speed. It can be extrapolated that the weight used (body weight) was not enough of a training stimulus to elicit improvements in strength. However, circuit training may improve aerobic capacity in runners with a lower VO2-max; therefore, benefiting their running.

Mixed strength training and explosive training, strength training alone and explosive training alone appear to be helpful in improving overall strength and power development in runners (recreational only running less than lactate threshold). Unfortunately, most running programs for runners incorporate higher paced running (greater than lactate threshold) to elicit improvements in the aerobic system. It would have been interesting to see how this type of strength training breakdown (MAX, EXP, MIX) would apply to those running with a higher running volume and to those who also incorporate more faster paced running.

Thanks for reading. I hope you found this info helpful.

-JK

References

Taipale, R.S., Mikkola, J., Vesterinen, V., Nummela, A., and Hakkinen, K. (2012). Neuromuscular adaptations during combined strength and endurance training in endurance runners: Maximal versus explosive strength training or a mix of both. Eur J of Appl Phys. Epub ahead of print.

photo credit: midiman via photopin cc

trap bar deadlift

A few of my wonderful friends and colleagues recommended JKC. I was told by one colleague that “It’ll be the best thing you ever do for yourself” and she was right! To be honest, I didn’t have much experience in any gym setting. And NO prior weight training experience. It was always so overwhelming! But from the first day, nothing was intimidating about JKC. Each workout is set up just for me, and with my specific skills and goals in mind. There are no stupid questions, you learn as you go, and what I really love, I always feel included and important, regardless of my skills/experience.

My initial goal was to find qualified personal training services in a personalized small gym setting. I have never been a fan of large gyms. JKC offers a friendly, happy gym experience that motivates me to strive for bigger and better results every week. Jon, Thomas and Craig are genuinely talented and always excited to celebrate everyone’s success.

I have a passion for challenging myself to achieve or beat goals. My favourite memories take me back to greater wins than I ever imagined with deadlifts and after a lot of determination and hard work, being able to do multiple chin-ups. Training at JKC has been one of the best experiences of my life – thank you for your commitment to helping me stay fit!!💪🏼😅

I’ve always been a gym rat, but was getting tired of the same ol’ routine. My better half was attending JKC and encouraged me to try it out. My favourite part of JKC is that is isn’t a gym – it’s a community. Jon and Thomas are awesome, and I love that every time I go I know who’s working out with me and we can socialize while working on our health. Everyone is supportive, encouraging and genuinely looks out for one another. It’s an upbeat and positive experience and I can honestly say that I look forward to each and every workout.

I started training at JKC in 2016 because I’ve always had upper back issues that became aggravated through work. I sought out other training and physio, but experienced little to no results. A client of mine happened to be coming to JKC for a similar issue and highly recommended it. I have had great success and haven’t looked back! I always feel like I’m getting programs tailored to my needs and I’m never bored. I’m 30 weeks pregnant now with my second child and have been able to workout through both pregnancies here at JKC. Even on my least mobile days, I felt safe to workout because my programs were specifically modified for my needs.

I had virtually no real experience using weights and felt intimidated going gyms. I avoided gym-goers using free weights, especially when hearing that loud crash, as they would drop weights to the floor. I thought this was to show everyone around them that they owned that area and that I shouldn’t go anywhere near! So I guess I just wanted to learn how to lift weights safely in a gym environment.

I spent over 18 years in the British Military, so I got to use some nice gyms. 99% of my time and experiences in those gyms was spent doing cardiovascular workouts, because I could just jump on a treadmill, plug in my head phones and do my own thing! JKC is different, because they have given me the confidence to use free weights and equipment that I had feared for years. Their demonstrations and knowledge is impeccable and I thank them for their continuous belief and support they show me at every session.

As Seen On: